The lower center is for the Reaver, and the upper center is for the Warhound. and download the add-on to view Photobucket linked images. Go AD FREE today! So for example the old rhinos don’t really look much like the FW deimos rhinos from 30k, or the 40k one. Using the specs from that thread which come from FW books and WD articles I mocked up Landraiders, Rhinos, and Thunderhawks to print at AT scale and nothing looked right compared to one another. - Sindri Myr, "There is no meaning, no purpose. A questoris knight vs a knight Paladin, a knight Crusader, a knight Lancer and a knight Castellan. New AT is the same scale as old Epic, and has never been 8 mm (well, more like 1:267 when actually measured against given canonical heights, which gives our 1,8 meter scale human a ~6,5 mm height). The 8 mm thing was a marketing blunder from the WC team who took the designers' "marines would look cool at 8 mm if we were to do them" line and ran with it. Now this picture of the fire-arc templates makes more sense. Should really be painting Crimson Fists. So absolutely close enough in scale, then. Edited by Sherrypie, 04 June 2019 - 11:12 PM. My Adeptus Titanicus Legio Vulturum aka Gore Crows, My Blood Angels (30k and 40k all mixed up). This thread is actually wildly incorrect. The Epic infantry is perfectly in line with stuff like the smaller doors in the Civitas sets. As the title says. The problem is that old EPIC had no scale at all - titans were different from tanks from flyers from infantry, and even within these, for example xenos titans had a different scale than imperial ones. Here’s a good look at exactly how big the new titans are. Are Adeptus Titanicus and the old Epic stuff the same scale, or is there difference? You can see the biggest of the three templates in the right center of the sprue is for the Warlord and is placed up against the front of its oval base. I've been getting into some of the AdMech novels that involve Titans lately and started to really like the Warhounds and want to get a model of one. The AT18 Warhound is slightly larger than a box dread. For what it is worth, here are a couple of comparison pics I took right after I started assembling my first models. Adeptus Titanicus BREAKING: Look How Big These Minis Are. Edited by Mendi Warrior, 05 June 2019 - 06:46 AM. My AT project log http://www.bolterand...us-project-log/. This thread is actually wildly incorrect. Page 1 of 2 - Titanicus and Epic scale comparison? You currently have javascript disabled. Press J to jump to the feed. I still kind of want to field them instead of having them act as dust magnets though and wanted to know how big they are compared to regular 40k models to figure out what they could be suitable proxies for. GW had an Adeptus Titanicus box in their display case at GENCON 2018 but was not doing demos. It looks like each floor os a building is just under the height of a Knight. My second warlord completed, complete with corruption, skulls, blood, more skulls, and a couple more skulls. So it's about what the difference between Epic-era models and modern-era models are (in some cases) or...? Several functions may not work. Need translation help :) (AT Titans), This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to + Adeptus Titanicus: The Horus Heresy +.
However you could also just play Adeptus Titanicus. 30k / 40k / Epic: Truescale Death Guard / Mechanicum project http://www.bolterand...s-with-the-xiv/, AT: Legio Favilla walks, Ashen Gods unleashed http://www.bolterand...gods-unleashed/.